Vast amounts of clinical and global experience show how the introduction of Digital Chest Drainage systems has significantly impacted the medical field.
Streamlined care clinically proven to give better outcomes.
How can we help you?CONTACT US NOW
15+ Years of Digital Drainage Research and Innovation
ERAS® guidelines for enhaced recovery after lung surgery with strong recommendation for digital drainage 1.
NICE (an executive non-departmental public body of the Department of Health in the UK) recommends Thopaz+ for managing chest drains 2. "At a national level, adopting
Thopaz+ is expected to save around £8.5 million ($10.68 million) per year in England.
New AWMF S3-Leitlinie (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany S3 Guideline) 3 recommends digital drainage for primary/secondary pneumothorax.
1,000,000 patients treated with Thopaz or Thopaz+.
Clinical data of 120 cardiac patients showed more efficient fluid collection due to continuous suction 4.
CADTH (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health) appraisal for compact digital chest drainage systems 5.
Data of international multicenter study shows significant reduction of chest tube duration and length of stay 6.
Publication of "Consensus definitions ESTS, AATS and STS to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space"8.
Robert J. Cerfolio, thoracic surgeon and thought leader acknowledges the benefits of Thopaz after pulmonary resection.9
First patient on Thopaz.
Introduction of Santhora Thoracic Drainage System.
NICE recommends Thopaz+ portable digital chest drainage device.
NICE (an executive non-departmental public body of the Department of Health in the UK) recommends Thopaz+ for managing chest drains 2.
"At a national level, adopting Thopaz+ is expected to save around £8.5 million per year in England."
- Thopaz+ reduces chest tube duration and length of stay (in hospital).
- Thopaz+ Improves safety for people with chest drains.
- Thopaz+ Improves clinical decision-making through continuous objective monitoring of air leaks and fluid loss.
- Thopaz+ Increases patient mobility.
- Healthcare providing staff finds Thopaz+ more convenient and easier to use than conventional chest drains.
Get in touch with us today
Find your local Medela office and contact information here.CONTACT US NOW
1- Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society and the european society of thoracic surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2018. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304509 2- NICE Guidance MTG37: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/MTG37 3- AWMF S3-Leilinie: Diagnostik und Therapie von. Spontanpneumothorax und postinterventionellem Pneumothorax http://www.awmf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Leitlinien/010_Thoraxchirurgie/010-007ag_S3_Spontanpneumothorax-postinterventioneller-Pneumothorax-Diagnostik-Therapie_2018-03.pdf 4- Barozzi, L. et al., 2015: Do we still need wall suction for chest drainage? J Cardiovascular Surgery.2015;56(Supp.1)102. 5- Rapid Response Report: Compact Digital Thoracic Drain Systems for the Management of Thoracic Surgical Patients: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness . https://cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/htis/dec-2014/RC0590%20Compact%20Digital%20Thoracic%20Drain%20Final.pdf 6- Pompili, C. et al., 2014: Multicenter International Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 98: 490–497. 7- Read https://www.medela.co.uk/healthcare/news-events/news/medela-wins-bbh-award 8- Brunelli, A. et al., 2011: Consensus definitions to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space. A collaborative proposal by ESTS, AATS, STS, and GTSC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.: 40(2):291-7. 9- Cerfolio, Robert J. et al., The Benefits of Continuous and Digital Air Leak Assessment After Elective Pulmonary Resection: A Prospective Study.The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , 396 - 401.